Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions. - GK Chesterton

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Redemptionis Sacramentum

I've seen this document (Redemptionis Sacramentum) quoted many times, but have never sat down and read it in it's entirety. Tonight, I started doing just that. From wikipedia:
Redemptionis Sacramentum is the title of an instruction on the proper way to celebrated Mass in the Roman Rite and, with the necessary adjustments, in other Latin liturgical rites. It was issued by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments on 25 March 2004. The text of the instruction is available on the Holy See's website.

Below are certain excerpts I found particularly pertinent. There will be more to follow in the future (I've only made it to page 15 so far). My comments in red.


4
it is not possible to be silent about the abuses, even quite grave ones, against the nature of the Liturgy and the Sacraments as well as the tradition and the authority of the Church, which in our day not infrequently plague liturgical celebrations in one ecclesial environment or another. In some places the perpetration of liturgical abuses has become almost habitual, a fact which obviously cannot be allowed and must cease.
reminds me of a video I once saw:
http://cleansingfiredor.blogspot.com/2009/08/new-youtube-video.html

8
the Eucharist “is too great a gift to tolerate ambiguity or depreciation”. It is therefore necessary that some things be corrected or more clearly delineated so that in this respect as well “the Eucharist will continue to shine forth in all its radiant mystery”.
Certainly we must protest in charity, but as mentioned earlier we must not remain silent. What is our priority? Jesus should be #1 - not the comfort of complacency.

11
The Mystery of the Eucharist “is too great for anyone to permit himself to treat it according to his own whim, so that its sacredness and its universal ordering would be obscured”. On the contrary, anyone who acts thus by giving free reign to his own inclinations, even if he is a Priest, injures the substantial unity of the Roman Rite, which ought to be vigorously preserved, and becomes responsible for actions that are in no way consistent with the hunger and thirst for the living God that is experienced by the people today.
Say the Black. Do the Red.

12
it is the right of all of Christ’s faithful that the Liturgy, and in particular the celebration of Holy Mass, should truly be as the Church wishes, according to her stipulations as prescribed in the liturgical books and in the other laws and norms. Likewise, the Catholic people have the right that the Sacrifice of the Holy Mass should be celebrated for them in an integral manner, according to the entire doctrine of the Church’s Magisterium.
Lay people have rights? Yes, it's true, but not the rights that the progressivists claim.

21
the Bishop must take care not to allow the removal of that liberty foreseen by the norms of the liturgical books
For instance denying communion on the tongue or teaching that taking communion on the tongue implies scrupulosity.

24
It is the right of the Christian people themselves that their diocesan Bishop should take care to prevent the occurrence of abuses in ecclesiastical discipline, especially as regards the ministry of the word, the celebration of the sacraments and sacramentals, the worship of God and devotion to the Saints.
By "taking care", they must mean burying your head in the sand or looking the other way, right?

27
As early as the year 1970, the Apostolic See announced the cessation of all experimentation as regards the celebration of Holy Mass and reiterated the same in 1988. Accordingly, individual Bishops and their Conferences do not have the faculty to permit experimentation with liturgical texts or the other matters that are prescribed in the liturgical books.

30
It must be lamented that, especially in the years following the post-Conciliar liturgical reform, as a result of a misguided sense of creativity and adaptation, there have been a number of abuses which have been a source of suffering for many”.
People are suffering? Yes, transitively through the profanation of Jesus. In the same way (although obviously not to the same degree) as Mary watching her son's crucifixion.

3 comments:

  1. If people would do what you did, Ben, and actually read the documents of the Church, there would be no problems. It would be black and white. But what impetus is there for the people to read the documents when their own bishop doesn't even acknowledge the content found therein?
    ReplyDelete
  2. This document is a dagger to progressive Catholicism, but meaningless until some bishops (Clark) and Rome seriously enforce it.

    ~Dr. K
    ReplyDelete
  3. Be careful, Ben. This document is the primary reason I became a liturgical snob :). Seriously, it so clearly outlines the abuses that we endure in the DOR every week, that I can't possibly imagine how it is ignored in our diocese. But it is. Even when the document is quoted line by line, priests and our Bishop will tell you that you aren't reading it the "right way." Or even better, they will say that the DOR has a special "recognitio" to do things the way it does.
    ReplyDelete